Refutation of wahabies on Hadith of Aisha (ra)


 

Narrated Masruq:

`Aisha said, “If anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen his Lord, he is a liar, for Allah says: ‘No vision can grasp Him.’ (6.103) And if anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen the Unseen, he is a liar, for Allah says: “None has the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah.”

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يُوسُفَ، حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ، عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، عَنْ مَسْرُوقٍ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ ـ رضى الله عنها ـ قَالَتْ مَنْ حَدَّثَكَ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا صلى الله عليه وسلم رَأَى رَبَّهُ فَقَدْ كَذَبَ وَهْوَ يَقُولُ {لاَ تُدْرِكُهُ الأَبْصَارُ} وَمَنْ حَدَّثَكَ أَنَّهُ يَعْلَمُ الْغَيْبَ فَقَدْ كَذَبَ، وَهْوَ يَقُولُ لاَ يَعْلَمُ الْغَيْبَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ.
English reference: Vol. 9, Book 93, Hadith 477

Arabic reference: Book 98, Hadith 7469

yeh hadees sahi hai…………….Ahle sunnat wal jamaat ka aqeeda hai ki ALLAH taala ka ilm e ghaib zaati hai aur NABi sallllallahualaihiwassalam ka ilme ghaib ataai hai
is hadees k mutabik…….zaati ilm e ghaib par hai…………..yaani jo b kahe ki nabi ko ilm e ghaib hai……yaani zaati ilm e ghaib woh jhuta hai
zaati sirf ALLAH ka hai
aur agar hum ise ataai kahege toh yeh hadees Quran sharif se takra gai…..jo na mumkin hai…q hadees agar takra jaye quran se toh hadees radd hoti hai
lekin hadees sahi hai
quran ki surah al-imran aayat no.179 padhna
“Aur ALLAH ki yeh Shaan nahin hai k Ae Aam logon tum ko GAIB ka ILM de, haanALLAH chun leta hai apne Rasoolon main se jis ko chahe”. (PARAH#4,Surah # Al-Imran, Aayat#179)

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

We have Qawl of Ummul Momineen (Mother of All Believers) Hadrat Ayesha Saddiqa R.A and Verdict of leading authority over Tafsir of Qur’an amongst Sahaba i.e. Ibn Abbas R.A who differed with Sayyidah Ayesha r.a in this regard. This difference has been wrongly understood by Salafis whereas in reality the rejection of Sayyidah Aisha (ra) is of “IDRAAK (COMPLETE COMPREHENSION OF ALLAH)” which we Ahlus Sunnah also reject, but rejection of Idraak does not mean Prophet did not see Allah at all.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Secondly Sayyidah Aisha (ra) was a child when al-Isra Wal Mi’raaj took place, remember it took place in the Meccan period before Hijrah and Sayyidah Aisha (ra) was married to Prophet (Peace be upon him) 1 year “AFTER HIJRAH” and the Marriage took place when she was only 6 (consummated when she was 9). Hence Sayyidah Aisha (RA) was less than 4 years of age when incident of Mi’raaj took place, hence the opinion of senior Sahaba shall be taken into account as they understood the incident more properly. We would like to clarify that we accept the valid difference of opinion over this issue but the Istadlal of Wahabiyyah is null and void because they are people of Hawa (desires) and they do not follow a school of Jurisprudence nor do they follow the schools of Ahlus Sunnah called Ash’ari/Maturidi, hence even if they reach a valid opinion It will for sure stand rejected in sight Allah and his Apostle (Peace be upon him) (English answer by Brother Syed Akram Ashraf on facebook)



Below is the Sharh of the hadith from Aisha (RA) in words of the great Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal (rah) whom the so called “Muqalid Salafis claim to follow. This is cited by the leading commentator of Bukhari i.e. Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani (rah)





Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani (Rahimuhullah) says in his magnificent Fath ul Bari Sharh Sahih ul Bukhari:



عن المروزي قلت لأحمد إنهم يقولون إن عائشة قالت من زعم أن محمدا رأى ربه فقد أعظم على الله الفرية فبأي شيء يدفع قولها قال بقول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم رأيت ربي قول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أكبر من قولها

Translation: Maruzi (rah) asked Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal (rah): People say that Aisha (ra) used to exclaim that whosoever says the Prophet (Peace be upon him) saw his Lord has attributed a lie to Allah, so how shall this be answered? (Imam Ahmed) replied: From the saying of Prophet (Peace be upon him) [himself] when he said: “رأيت ربي” i.e. I saw my Lord, this will be an answer to Aisha (ra)’s Qawl because the saying of Prophet (Peace be upon him) is far superior than saying of her (i.e. Aisha ra)



Reference: Best commentary over Sahih Bukhari called Fath ul Bari, Sharh Sahih ul Bukhari, Volume No. 8, Page No. 494







Imam an-Nawawi (rah) the leading commentator of Sahih Muslim sheds more light on this, as he explains:

وإذا صحت الروايات عن ابن عباس في إثبات الرؤية وجب المصير إلى إثباتها فإنها ليست مما يدرك بالعقل , ويؤخذ بالظن , وإنما يتلقى بالسماع ولا يستجيز أحد أن يظن بابن عباس أنه تكلم في هذه المسألة بالظن والاجتهاد . وقد قال معمر بن راشد حين ذكر اختلاف عائشة وابن عباس : ما عائشة عندنا بأعلم من ابن عباس , ثم إن ابن عباس أثبت شيئا نفاه والمثبت مقدم على النافي

Translation: When it is proven from Sahih hadiths of Ibn Abbas (ra) then we cannot assume that he said it according to his own assumption, definitely he said this after hearing it from Prophet (Peace be upon him), Ma’mar bin Rashid (rah) said regarding the difference between Aisha (ra) and Ibn Abbas (ra) that Aisha (ra) was not aware about this (completely) whereas Ibn Abbas (ra) was, So when Ibn Abbas (ra) is proving it while some others are doing Nafi of it then It is a (Principle) that Masbat (Proof) takes over Nafi (rejection)



Reference: Sharh Sahih Muslim, Kitab al Iman, Chapter in meaning of :He saw him at the second descent

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Refutation of wahabies on Hadith of Aisha (ra)”

  1. Say: I do not say to you, I have with me the treasures of Allah, nor do I know the unseen, nor do I say to you that I am an angel; I do not follow aught save that which is revealed to me. Say: Are the blind and the seeing one alike? Do you not then reflect?’ (Surah Al Anaam (6): Verse 50)

    اے محمد ﷺ آپ ان سے کہیے کہ کہ میں یہ نہیں کہتا کہ میرے پاس اللہ کے خزانے ہیں۔ نہ ہی میں غیب کی باتیں جانتا ہوں اور نا ہی میں کہتا ہوں کہ میں فرشتہ ہوں میں تو اسی کی پیروی کرتا ہوں جو میری طرف وحی کی جا تی ہے۔ آپ اِن سے پوچھؑے کہ کیا نابینا اور بینا برابر ہو سکتے ہیں ؟ پھر تم لوگ کیوں نہیں سوچتے ؟

    1. برائے مہربانی قرآن سیکشن میں اسی آیت کا شان نزول پڑھ لیں تاکہ آپ کو جو غلط فہمی ہے وہ صاف ہوسکے محترم لائین صاحب

  2. Is ka matlab he k app Hazrat Aysha R.A ki Haditho ko nahin mante……Hazrat Aysha RA no Takreeban 2200 Hadith Rewayat ki hain…..To ap is me kis tarhan se sabit karenge k Hazrat Aisha RA ki Umar us waqt kya thi……………Afsos he ap k ilm par…..ALLAH Hidayat de AMeen

    1. Subhan Allah kya kehne apke dimagh keh keh tamam tafseel parh kar bhi MURGHI KI AIK HE TANG. Hazoor e waala Ayisha (rd) se marwi kya sari he ahadeeth Sanad Hasan hain ? Agar yahi sawal hum ap se karen keh apko Syadutna Aisha (rd) ki ahadith sub ki sub Thek he lagti hain to Sydatuna Aisha (rd) ki wo hadith jis main AP ne Madina ke logon ko Qbr e Mubarak e Rasool alehisalam ki khirki chat main bana kar Barish ke liye unse FARYAD ki jo hadith bayan ki hai wo ap wahabi deobandi ko kion hazam nahi hoti phir?

      3rd Sawal: Yahi jo sawal ap ne hum se kiya hai. Humara bhi sawal hai keh Ayaa Ap ne sub parh kar bih Aisha (rd) ki baat ko sahih mana.na hai to phir SYADUNA ABBAS (RD) ki hadith or qowl ko rad kar ke kya ap Ijma e Ummat ke munkar nahi ho rahe?

      4th Yaaa ap logon ke nazdeek hadith aik khel ka naam hai keh jo apke dharam ke mutabiq sahih hua usko maan liya jo nahi hova usko radd kar diya?

      5th Raha Umar ka sawal to ye sawal apka karna nadaani is liye hai keh yah ooper bayan ho chuka hai Salaf ke qowl ke mutabiq. Mazeed yeh keh Jub Waqia e Miraaj hua tha to Ap yani Aisha (Rd) ki umar kya thi ye apko tareekhi kitabon se asani se parhne ko mil sakta hai.

      Meherbani farma kar aitraz karne se pehle apna homework complete kar liya karen .

      Shukriya

    2. In mushrikon ki aqlon pr taalay lagay huay hain. In k bhonday dalayel to dekho ke Meraj k waqt Ayesha RA 4 saal se chhoti thi aur hijrat k waqt 8 saal ki thi. Ye nahi dekhtay ke jb Ayesha RA ne ye statement di to uss waqt un ki umer-e-mubarik kitni thi.
      Quran mein saaf Nabi SAW k elm-e-ghyb ki nafi hay, lekin inhon ne apni taraf se Atai aur Zati elm-e-ghyb ki terminology nikali hui hay. Elm-e-ghyb ko sabit krnay k liay Iz’har-e-Ghyb aur Ittelaa-Alal-Ghyb ki aayat pesh krtay hain.
      Jhooton pr Allah ki laanat ho jo Quran aur Hadith ko jhutlatay hain.

      1. Hamid Awan <—- Yani 2 Number Malaks or Ye bhi kaha jaa sakta hai keh Malkon ka timepass.

        Guzarish ye hai keh Khawarij par Chukne Rasul e Kareem alehisalam ne Lanat bheji hai lihaza ap par Lanat ki waja se apka dimagh kaam karne se qasir hai Apki BAKWAS k kuch jawabat arz hain

        1) Jub Rivayat ki Sehat par Aitraz nahi to BHONKNE Ki bajai ISKO ACCEPT kar ke ISRA OR MIRAJ E JISMANI ko Manty kion nahi ?

        2) Debate Tum nahi kar sakte hogay kionkeh Tumhari Oqat nahi hogi. Lekin Jinho ne kiya unke liye ye post 3 saal pehle lagi. AJ ap jese Jahannami kutta aa kar pehli baar bhonk raha hai. Bura mat maniye ga. Apki ye izat afzai ke zimadar ap khud hain kionkeh Ibne Maja ki Hadith main Khawarij ko jhannami kuttay kaha gaya hai or kutton ka kaam he bhonkna hota hai jo ap ne comments ko surat main kiya.

        3) Ahmed Raza Khan alehi rehmatalRahman 13 saal ki Umar main Mufti kehlaye hain to Apne Ilm ki waja se kehlaye hain. Sharayee maamlat main Fiqh ki zarorat hoti hai Or Ap jese Jahanami kuttay ka apne napak muh se ye muqadas nam Ummul Momineen k Rutbay se attach karna he Apki Khawarij yani (Wahabi Bhonkta ha lekin Samajhta nahi) ke mashoor maqoole ki ain tashreeh hai. Ye apki Jahalat ka aina hai. Or Jahan tak Karamat ka sawal hai. Beshak Hum to Muslim hain hum to manty hain Auliya ki karamat ko lekin Kabhi apne Waliden ki kitab yaani Wahhabi yon or Deobandaron Ki Karamat parhi hain? Agar nahi to humare Scans section main jaa kar apna muh kala zaror kijiye ga humko dilli massarat hogi. apke Pujjay Pitta shiri Syed ahmed barelvi Wahhabi or Ismail Dehla-denewali yani Dehlawi Ki Bakwasat or Karamt neez Apne Mufatari Ashraf ali Thntut ke bharway maamu ki karamat ka mutaliya bhi zaror kijiye ga apka dil garden garden hojaiga.

        4) 3rd sawal ka jawab ye hai keh lagta hai apne naam ki tarha taleemi lihaz se bhi paidal he ho 2 number cholay pas he ho. Kionkeh Is Post main zikar AISHA (RD) se related hadith ka ho raha hai us par jirah or mufasireen ki raye di gayi hai. Isra wal Miraj par Ibne Abbas (rd) or Degar ki scans dekhni hain to Takleef karo or Nalaiq k bachay ki tarha yahan bhonkne ki bajai scans section main jaa kar ISRA WAL MIRAJ KA FOLDER DEKH LO jis main tumhare Wahhabi Panditon ki kitabon ka dher laga hua hai.

        5) 4th sawal ka jawab: Ullu k pathay ho ap maaf kijiye ga . Wo isliye keh yahan Taqleed par behes nahi ho rahi. Misl mashoor hai keh (Wahhabi Bhonkta hai lekin Samajhta nahi) lihaza Ap bhi Bhonk rahe hain faqat samajh nahi rahe. Isra wal Miraj Aqaid k zumray main ata hai , naa keh Fiqh k zumray main. Yahan to ap ne BHONK kar apni shalwar utarwa di. Kisi or jaga bhonk kar apni Jahalat par logon ko mat hansayie ga.

        6) 4th) jo likha hai khel waghera. To again iska jawab yahi hai . BHONKNE se kuch nahi hoga. ISKO SAHIH HADITH maan kar bhi jo Munkar ho . wo QURAN OR HADITH ka SAHABA OR SALAF KA MUNKAR HAI. Lihaza again DONT BARK like a pitty dog

        Conclusion:

        Akhiri comment main ap ne jo bakwas ki hai. apni taraf se (IN MUSHRIKON) ,,, kya hum pooch sakte hain ap Gadhi k bachay ko Dosray par SHIRK KA FATWA lagane ka Haq kis BCD ne diya? Ya ap khud BC ho jo dalail mang rahe ho. Ullu k pathay ! Salay ! jo post lagi hai US ko Man.nay ki bajai APNe Dil ki bharas tujhe nikalni hai? Bohat charbi charhi hai tujhe haramkhor? Chal aisa kar Apni Kutti Nasal ke kisi Pandit ko lay aao ye raha address facebook group ka. Sub Salafi katooray wahan apna shaafi ilaj karwa sakte hain. (www.facebook.com/groups/zarbesunniyat). Quran main Ilm e ghaib ki nafi hai ? chal pehle sabit kar. saaf sareehan Keh kahan par nafi hai. balke Pehle Ilm e ghaib par tum Khawarij ke pichwaray par jo posts is blog par lagi hain wo parh le teri kharish tere he kitabon se khatam karne ka pura intizam hai.

        Or haan Lanat to tujhe par or teri poori nasal par RasulAllah alehisalaotwasalam ki taraf se hai. Lihaza tujh par he Pooray Jahan ki lanat ho kazaab nalaiq jahil baydeen khabees najdi k brahman followers

        Itna kafi hai ya kuch or Entertainment karo Suuwar?

        Or haan jate jate.

        Ilme Ghaib par pehle ye parh lay Nalaiq maa k bachay

        https://makashfa.wordpress.com/2015/03/31/view-of-ulema-of-ahlu-sunnah-on-elm-al-ghaib/

  3. سبحان اللہ بہت ہی عمدہ اور مدلل جواب ہے ساری خلش دور ہوگئی. جزاک اللہ خیرا کثیرا فی الدنیا و الآخرۃ.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s