Ijtihad-Ijma-&-Mujtahid Meaning (eng)


HolyQuran pic

 

Ijtihad – Mujtahid

[these are only general but brief explanations not detailed,but written as neutral point of view, written for one of our new Muslim brother/sister who wrote us a letter and ask about explanation on Ijtihad because Salafis asked him/her something else]

IJMA:

Is the third foundation of Islam. It literally means “collecting.” or “assembling,” and in Muslim divinity it expresses the unanimous consent of the Mujtahidun (Learned Scholars); A Mujtahid is a Muslim divine of the highest degree of learning, a title usually conferred by Muslim rulers.

There are three foundations of Ijma:

1) Ittifaq-e-Qauli, unanimous consent expressed in declaration of opinion.
2) Ittifaq-e-fi’li, expressed in unanimity of practice;
3) Ittefaq-e-Sakuti, when the majority of the Mujtahidun signified their tacit assent to the opinions of the minority by “silence” or non-interference.

The Mujtahidun capable of making Ijma’ must be “Men of Learning and Piety, not heretics, nor fools, but men of judgment.”

There is great diversity of opinion as to up to what period in the history of Islam Ijma’ can be accepted. Some doctors assert that only the Ijma’ of the Mujtahidun who were Ashab (Companions); others, that of those who were not only Companions but descendants of the Prophet, can be accepted; whilst other accept the Ijma’ of the Ansars (helpers), and of the Muhajirun (fugitives), who were dwellers in al-Madinah with Prophet alehisalam. The majority of learned Muslim divines, however, appear to think that Ijma’ may be collected in every age, although they admit that, owing to the numerous divisions which have arisen the days of the Taba’u’ t-Tabi’in (i.e, the followers of the followers of the Companions).

The following is considered to be the relative value of Ijma’:

That of the Ashab (Companions) is equal to Hadis Mutawatir. That which was decided afterwards, but in accordance with the unanimous opinion of the Ashab, is equal to Hadis-i Khabar-i-Mashhur, and that upon which there was diversity of opinion amongst the Ashab, but has since been decided by the later Mujtahidun is equal to Hadis-i-Khabar-i-Wahid.

Some outsider writers confuse the term Ijma with Ijtihad. But Ijtihad is the deduction made by a single Mujtahid, whilst Ijma’ is the collective opinion of a council of Mujtahidun, or enlightened scholars.

Amongst Shia’s, there are still Mujtahidun whose Ijma is accepted, but the Sunnis have four orthodox schools of interpretation, names after their respective founders, Hanafi, Shafi’e, Maliki, and Hanabil. The Wahhabi who are also known as (Salafis, Ahlu Hadith) reject Ijma collected after the death of the Companions. though even now they also deviated from the right path by totally rejecting the opinion of Companions too. (ref; Fatawa e Islamia), so they does not came into proper  defined Ummah.

The divide among Muslims today is actually is the occurance of the fullfilment of Prophecy by Prophet Muhammad (sal Allahu alehiwasalam) in which, as the Christians are divided, by its numerous sects, so its also in Muslims today, because, it is related, prophesied that as the Jewish was divided into 71 sects,and the Christians into 72! So Muslims would be divided into 73 sects.
IJTIHAD:
Lit. “Exertion.” The logical deduction on a legal or theological question by a Mujtahid of learned and enlightened doctor, as distinguished from Ijma’, which is the collective opinion of a council of scholars of highest eminence.This method of attaining to a certain degree of authority in searching into the principles of jurisprudence is sanctioned by the Traditions: (a’Hadis):
The Prophet (alehisalam) wished to send a man named by Mu’az to al-Yaman to recieve some money collected for alms, which has was then to distribute to the poor. On appointing him, he said:”O Mua’z, by what rule will you act?” He replied, ‘By the Law of the Quran.’ ‘But if you find no direction therein?’ ‘Then I will act according to the Sunnah of the Prophet.’ ‘But what if that fails?’ ‘Then I will make an Ijtihad, and act on that.’ the Rasoolillah alehisalam raised his hands and said, ‘Praise be to God who guides the messenger of His Prophet in what He pleases.'”

The growth of this system of divinity is traced by many Sunni writers, as!

1) God, the only legislator, has shown the way of felicity to the people whom He has chosen, and in order to enable them to walk in that way, He has shown to them the precepts which are found partly in the eternal Quran, and partly in the sayings of the Prophet (sal Allahu alehi wasalam) transmitted to posterity by the Companions and preserved in the Sunnah. That way is called the Shari’ah (law). The rules thereof are called Ahkam (commandments).

2) The Quran and the Sunnah, which since their manifestation are the primitive sources of the orders of the Law, form two branches of study, viz. ‘Ilm-i-Tafsir or the Interpretation of Holy Quran and ‘Ilm-i-Hadis‘, or the study of Tradition.

3) All the orders of the Law have regard either to the actions (Deen) or to the belief (Imaan) of the faithful (Mukallif).

4) As the Quran and the Sunnah are the principal elements of actual jurisprudence are the subject of ‘Ilm-i-Fiqh‘ or the science of Law.

Fiqah or Fiqh in its root signifies “conception, comprehension.” Thus Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) prayed for Ibn Masu’d (rd):”May God make him comprehend (Faqqaha-hu) and make him know the interpretation of the Quran.” Prophet Muhammad (alehisalatowasalam) in his unique quality of Judge and Chief of the believers decided, without appeal or contradiction, all the affairs of the people. His sayings served as guide to the Companions. After the death of the Prophet (alehisalam), the first Khalifahs acted on the authority of the Traditions (Hadis). Meanwhile, the Quran and the Sunnah, the principle elements of religion and legislation, became little by little the subject of controversy. It was then that men applied themselves vigorously to the task of learning by heart the Quran and the Traditions, and then that jurisprudence became a separate science. No science had as yet been systematically taught and the early Musalmans did not possess books which would serve for such teaching. A change soon, however, took place. In the early year in which the reat jurisconsult of Syria died. (A.H. 80) Syaduna Na’uman ibn Sabit, surnamed Imam al Azam Abu Hanifa (rd), was born. He is the most celebrated of the founders of the schools of jurisprudence, a science which ranks first in all Muslim seats of learning. Until that time and for thirty years later, the learned scholars had all their knowledge by heart, and those who possessed good memories were highly esteemed. Many of them knew by heart the Whole Quran with the comments made on it by the Prophet (sal Allahu alehi wasalam) by the Companions; they also knew the Traditions (ahadith) and their explanations, and all the commands which proceed from the Quran and Sunnah. Such men enjoyed the right of Mujtahidun. They transmitted their knowledge of the scholars orally. It was not until towards the middle of the second century of the Hijrah that treatise on the different branches of the Law were written, after which six schools (Madhabs) of jurisprudence were formed.
The founders (all Imams of the first class) were Abu Hanifa, the Imamu’l-A’zam or greatest Imam (A.H. 150), Sufyan as-Sauri (A.H. 161), Malik (A.H. 179), ash-Shafi’i (A.H. 204), Ibn Hanbal (A. H. 241), and the Imam Dawud as-Bahiri (A.H. 270). The two sects founded by as-Sauri and az-Zahiri became extinct in the eighth century of the HIjrah. The other four still remain. These man venerated one another. The younger ones speak with great respect of the elder. Thus Imam Shafi’e says: “No one in the world was so well versed in jurisprudence as Abu Hanifa was, and he who has read neither his works nor those of his disciples know nothing of jurisprudence.” Ibn Hanbal, when sick, wore a shirt which had belonged to Imam Shafi’e, in order that he might be cured of his malady; but all this did not prevent them starting schools of their own, for the right of Ijtihad is granted to those who are real Mujtahidun.

There are three degrees of Ijtihad:

1) Ijtihad fi’ sh-Shar‘, absolute independence in legislation.

2) Ijtihad fi’l Madhab‘, authority in the judicial systems founded by the Mujtahidun of the first class.

3) Ijtihad fil Mas’ail, authority in cases which have not been decided by the authors of the four systems of jurisprudence.

The first is called a complete and absolute authority, the second relative, and the third special.
(1) Ijtihad fi’sh-Shar

Absolute independence in legislation is the gift of God. He to whom it is given when seeking to discover to meaning of the Divine Law is not bound to follow any other teacher. He can use his own judgment. This gift was bestowed on the jurisconsults of the first, and to some of the second and third centuries. (Khair al Qa’roon). The Companions, however, who were directly connected with the Prophet (alehisalam), having transmitted immediately to their posterity the treasures of legislation, a looked upon as Mujtahidun of much higher authority than those of the second and third centuries. Thus Abu Hanifa (rd) says: “That which comes to us from the Companions is on our head and eyes (i.e., to be recieved with respect): as to that which comes from the Tabi’un, they are men and we are men.”
Since the time of the Ta’biun, this degree of Mujtahid has only been conferred on the six great Imams before mentioned. Theoretically any Muslim can attain to this degree, but it is one of the principles of jurisprudence that the confirmation of this rank is dependent on many conditions, and so no one now gains the honour. These conditions are:-

1) The knowledge of the Quran and all that is related to it; that is to say, a complete knowledge of Arabic literature, a profound acquaintance with the orders of the relationship to each other and their connection with the orders of the Sunnah. The candidate should know when and why each verse of the Quran was written, he should have a perfect acquaintance with the literal meaning of the words, the speciality or generality of each clause, the abrogating and abrogated sentences. He should be able to make clear the meaning of the “obscure” passages (Mutashabih), to discriminate between the literal and the allegorical, the universal and the particular.
2) He must know the Quran be heat with all the Traditions and explanations.

3) He must have a perfect knowledge of the Traditions (Hadith), or at least of three thousand of them. He must know their connection with the laws of the Quran. He should know by heart the most important Traditions.

4) A pious and austere life.
5) A profound knowledge of all the sciences of the Law.
Should anyone now aspire to such a degree another condition would be added, viz:-

6) A complete knowledge of the four schools of jurisprudence.

The obstacles, then, are almost insurmountable. On the one hand, there is the severity of the ‘Ulama’, which requires from the candidate things almost impossible; on the other there is the attachment of the ‘Ulama’ to their own Imams, for should such a man arise, no one is bound now to listen to him. The Imam Ibn Hanbal said: “Draw your knowledge from whence the Imams drew theirs, and do not content yourself with following others, for that is certainly blindness of sight.” Thus the schools of four Imams remain intact after a thousand years have passed, and so the ‘Ulama’ recognize since the time of these Imams no Mujtahid of the first degree. Ibn Hanbal was the last.

The rights of the man who attained to this degree were very important. He was not bound to be a disciple of another, he was a mediator between the Law and his followers, for whom he established a system of legislation, without anyone having the right to make any objection. He had the right to explain the Quran, the Sunnah, and the Ijma’, according as he understood them. He used the Prophet’s words, whilst his disciples only used his. Should a disciple find some discrepancy between a decision of his own Imam and the Quran or Traditions, he must abide by the decision of the Imam. The Law does not permit him to interpret after his own fashion. When once the disciple has entered the school of one Imam he cannot leave it an join another. He loses the right of private judgment, for only a Mujtahid of the first class can dispute the decision of one of the Imams. Theoretically, such Mujtahidun may still arise; but, as we have already shown, practically they do now.

(2) Ijtihad fil Madhab:

This degree has been granted to the immediate disciples of the great Imams who have elaborated the system of their masters. They enjoyed the special consideration of the contemporary ‘Ulama’, and of their respective Imams who in some cases have allowed them to retain their own opinion. The most famous of these men are the two disciples of Abu Hanifa.i.e, Imam Abu Yusuf, and Muhammad Ibn al-Hasan. In a secondary matter, their opinion carries great weight. It is laid down as a rule that Mufti may follow the unanimous opinion of these two even when it goes against that of Abu Hanifah (rd).
(3) Ijtihad fil Masa’il:

This is the degree of special independence. The candidates for it should have a perfect knowledge of all the branches of jurisprudence according to the four schools of Arabic language and literature. They can solve cases which come before them, giving reasons for their judment, or decide on cases which have not been sttle by previous Mujtahidun; but in either case, their decisions must always be in absolute accordance with the opinions of the Mujtahidun of the first and second classes, and with the principles which guided them. Many of these men attained great celebrity during their lifetime, but to most of them this rank is no accorded until after their death. Since their Imam Qazi khan died (A.H. 592), no one has been recognized by the Sunnis as a ‘Mujtahid’ even of the third class.

There are three inferior classes of Jurists, called Muqallidun, or followers of the Mujtahiddun; but all that the highest in rank amongst them can do is to explain obsure passages in the writings of the older jurisconsults. By some of the ‘Ulama’ they are considered to be equal to the Mujtahidun of the third class. If there are several conflicting legal opinions on any point, they can select one opinion on which to base their decision. This a mere Qazi cannot do. In such a case he would have to refer to these men or to their writings for guidance. They seem to have written commentaries on the legal system without originating anything new. The author of the Hidayah, who lived at the end of the sixth century, was a Muqallid.

————

INSPIRATION: Arabic Wahy. According to the Nuru’l Anwar, by Sheikh Mulla Jeevan Ahmad (A.H. 1130) inspiration is of two kinds. Wahy zahir, external inspiration, or Wahy batin, internal inspiration.

A. Wahy zahir (External Inspiration) is of three kinds:

1) Wahyu Quran, or that which was received from the mouth of the angel Gabriel, and reached the ear of the Prophet, after he knew beyond doubt that it was the angel who spoke to him. This is the only kind of inspiration admitted to be in the Quran. It is sometimes called the Wahy Matlu.
2) Isharatu’l Malak, or that which was received from the angel, but not by word of mouth, as when the Prophet said,”the Holy Ruh has breathed into my heart.”

3) Ilham or Wahyu qalb, or that which was made known to the Prophet alehisalam by the “light of prophecy.” This kind of inspiration is said to be possessed by Walis or Saints, in which case it may be either true or false.
B. Wahy batin (Internal Inspiration) is that which the Prophet alehisalam obtained by thought and analogical reasoning, just as the Mujtahidun, or enlightened scholars doctors of the law obtain it. It is the belief of all orthodox Muslims that their Prophet alehisalam always spoke on matters of religion by the lower forms of inspiration (i.e, Isharatu’l-Malak, Ilham, or Wahyu qalb); and consequently a Hadis is held to be inspired in as great a degree, although not in the same manner as the Quran itself. The inspiration of the Hadis is called the Wahy ghair matlu. (See Nuru’l-Anwar, pg. 181; Mishkat, book i, Ch Vi, Pg 2)

Suratu’n-Najm, [Quran 53:2] “Your lord (sahib) erreth not, nor he led astray, neither speaketh he from impulse.”

The following is a description of inspiration as given by Ibn Khaldun, “The sign that a man is inspired,” he says,”that he is at time completely absent, though in the society of others. His respiration is stentorious (powerful) and he seems to be in a cataleptic fit or in a swoon. This however, is merely apparent; for in reality such an ecstasis [esctasy] is an absorption into the invisible world; and he has within his grasp what he alone is able to conceive, which is above the conception of others. Subsquently these spiritual visions descend and become perceptible to the faculties of man. They are either whispered to him in a low tone, or an angel appears to him in human form and tells him what he brings from God. Then the ecstasis ceases, and the prophet remembers what he has heard.”

Conclusion:
As you read, if there were no scholars of such status, then we would’nt be able to presever the literature of Islam from 1300 years, till today. All prophetic traditions and Quranic aspects were not been established till this date. Wahhabism on the other hand is a new diverted sect, who tries to bypass all these scholars and to bypass all of the extended work of Quran and Sunnah, just for a reason, that they could be called and considered more better Muslims than all those people in 1300 years. If a Wahabi consider that its essential to not to follow any one Imam in matters of Fiqh, then they need to establish their own new science of Quran and hadith, and that must have to be proven from either Quran, or Sunnah Traditions or Act of the 3 blessed generations of Islam. E.g If any Salafi wants to establish his verdict upon some issue, and bypassing any Imam, then he first need to establish a link with either chain of narrations like used in Hadith. Also that chain must have to be authenticated by all Muslims and the most important thing is, if even though which is practically impossible for them to do, still if in any miraculous way its been happened, then they must have to show the source, and chain which reached to Prophet alehisalam. If they can’t do this, please stop your nonsense and be a Muslim not a salafi. Further, If you want to establish your own school, then you must have to fulfill all these requirements of a Mujtahid to Object on Imams, because, only that person can object on them, who has authority, Can we ask you. WHAT IS YOUR AUTHENTICITY?

 

Your all hadis hadis shouting is just to impress new muslims, so to convert them to your deviancy and turn their honor of accepting the TRUTH OF ISLAM into disguise. Its like a condition, that the most famous sweets shop usually having bad ingredients in the products. so as this example, Wahhabis are using wrong ingredients in their beliefs. And that is the reason they are’nt part of the Ummah anymore, and they are among 72 deviant sects. Sunni Islam is the only and only genuine orthodox traditional Islam. and Tassawuf (Sufis) are their souls. And yes when we say Sufis, it means the real Sufis, not the fame mongers or fortune tellers.

 

wAllahu Aa’lm wa Rasuluhu

Advertisements

One thought on “Ijtihad-Ijma-&-Mujtahid Meaning (eng)”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s